Well, it’s been over two months since I started this blog and posted anything to it, and I think it’s high time that I begin to post to it regularly and keep it updated. So here goes.
A lot has happened in the meantime. One of the first writing-related events was the acceptance of my article on grammar problems by the EzineArticles online Web magazine. It was published 17 November 2011:
And yes, I truly do perceive the breakdown of English grammar (especially here in the USA) as a serious epidemic.
It’s become pervasive — even presumably “educated” people (politicians, journalists, etc.) are talking like illiterate doofuses with utterances such as “He had went downtown…” and “It was time for she and I to go….” Yuk!
Other consequences include the deterioration of communication among us English-speaking humans and especially the degradation of pleasurable, elegant literary craftwork. A lot of routine written material (like news, business, and legal writing) has become so garbled, often filled with malapropisms, that you end up scratching your head, trying to figure out what the writer is trying to say. And way too much supposedly artistic creative writing tends to be filled with annoying fundamental errors that can distract and embarrass. (In otherwise truly brilliant writing, such grammatical blips are small but unfortunate blemishes.)
Why is this? I suspect a major part of the problem was a decision, perhaps 3 decades or so ago, by the English teaching establishment to basically stop concentrating on teaching correct grammar to students (starting at elementary level) and sort of “go with the flow” … in other words, just pretty much accept the way people talk as the way to define proper English. Not A Good Idea.
I may elaborate more on this later, and possibly publish an article on this issue. But I hesitate to write too much in one place in this blog about it, because of the Google-Panda menace (I’ve written articles about this, and will post links later). What this basically means is that if you write extensively about something, then try to use those same thoughts (and words, to some extent) in a publishable article, your article may be rejected by the publisher because it will be robot-checked as a “duplicate” with whatever you wrote originally. Maybe you can see why I refer to this as a “menace”. Anyway, more to come on this…